Thursday, February 28, 2008

Ronald Wieck's 911 skeptic show~starring Arthur Scheuerman


Well here it is folks, right out here in front of God and everybody. These nerds from the JREF blog have been very busy on the innertubes, even setting up web sites like the ones of Mark Roberts. Ronald Wieck claims that he can find no one from the Truth Movement (his term) that "has the stones" to accept an interview on his show. What a laugh. He probably doesn't have enough paper to send copies to all of the Architects, Engineers, Scientists, Generals in the military, Ex CIA men, etc. etc. I think the trick here is....you have to first be invited to accept...G:

They also showed up on Susie-Q's blog on the post Who is Arthur Scheuerman? Pomaroo & Gravy (the nerds in the video) in spite of their smug condemnation of what they call troofers and their proclamation that they can't get one to accept their invitation are indeed interviewing someone from Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, who is a member and holds a Fire Science Technology AAS Degree.

Pop up some popcorn, pull up a chair, enjoy the show

Open your mind, let down your hair, get in the know



9/11 Physics: "You Can't Use Common Sense"


They say everything changed on 9/11, and they sure weren't whistling Dixie! We all learned something about physics we would never have guessed.

Here is an early reference paper (pdf file) written originally on 9/13/01 called...

Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse ? - Simple Analysis

By Zdenek P. Bazant1, Fellow ASCE, and Yong Zhou2

Abstract: This paper3 presents a simplified approximate analysis of the overall collapse of the towers of World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001. The analysis shows that if prolonged heating caused the majority of columns of a single floor to lose their load carrying capacity, the whole tower was doomed. The structural resistance is found to be an order of magnitude less than necessary for survival, even though the most optimistic simplifying assumptions are introduced.

This was used as reference in Arthur Scheuermans...

The Towers, Fire- Induced Collapse and the Building Codes Summary;

The Towers, Fire- Induced Collapse and the Building Codes Summary;
A preliminary interpretation of the evidence in the analysis of the cause of the large loss of life and collapse of the World Trade Center Towers & and recommended code changes to mitigate the chance of a recurrence, in high-rise office buildings.
July 17, 2003 Draft #13

By: Arthur Scheuerman, Battalion Chief FDNY (Ret.), Former Instructor Nassau County Fire
Training Academy and high-rise Fire Safety Director NYC.

20 comments:

  1. One of the things that they are trying to debunk is Larry Silverstein's "Pull it" quote'

    VIDEO

    I don't know where Mark Roberts is coming from, but he is saying that people on the ground didn't confer with anyone else. However what Silverstein says he was doing on the video was confering with the people on the ground...G:?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Memory-induced brain damage like Abu Gonzo contracted during the lawyer firing circus G:?

    Those guys can pull this!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yep, it could be worse Dad, these nerds are supposed to be intellectuals. If they are really a part of intelligent life, it seems to me, their talents are being wasted.

    If the truth is what they seek, then it is only logical that they would promote an open and independent investigation...G:

    ReplyDelete
  4. Some of the glaring conflicts between Pomaroos video show and Arthur Scheuermans article of Dec. 8, 2006

    The Collapse of Building 7 by Arthur Scheuerman December 8, ‘06


    from the video

    Pomaroo: Do you think this was a safe building.

    Arthur says "No" blah blah blaw yada yadayadayada


    from Arthur's article

    Because of the damage to the building and the failure of the water
    supply, after talking to the owner, the Fire Department decided to evacuate the
    building and not to attempt to control the fires but to let them burn out. Since it
    was a “fire resistive” building, there would have been every expectation that the
    fires would burn out without any local or global collapse. However, given that the
    towers had collapsed and that there had been a serious interior collapse of
    Building 5, there was concern, and the collapse area around the building was
    cleared.


    from the video

    Mark Robertson: “people on the ground didn’t confer with anyone else”.

    from Arthur's article

    after talking to the owner, the Fire Department decided to evacuate the
    building and not to attempt to control the fires but to let them burn out. Since it
    was a “fire resistive” building, there would have been every expectation that the
    fires would burn out without any local or global collapse.


    from the video

    Pomaroo: "Now Arthur it sounds to me like this is an extraordinary feat by the fire department to avoid
    any more loss of life on this terrible day".

    Arthur says "Yeh, absolutely, especially when you abandon a building and there is an uncontrolled fire, there is a possibility of collapse no matter what kind of building it is uh if the fire is bad enough


    from Arthur's article

    Because of the damage to the building and the failure of the water
    supply, after talking to the owner, the Fire Department decided to evacuate the
    building and not to attempt to control the fires but to let them burn out. Since it
    was a “fire resistive” building, there would have been every expectation that the
    fires would burn out without any local or global collapse.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ron Wieck did try to find a truther to debate on the Hardfire show. It wasn’t for lack of trying. Nobody for 'truth' took up the challenge.

    http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=106814

    http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?postid=3388575#post3388575

    Keep in mind that Hardfire is a public access program with no budget for travel or accommodations for show guests. When Jim Fetzer debated Mark Roberts, members of the JREF forum actually took up a collection to pay Fetzer's airfare.

    ReplyDelete
  6. There was an old woman

    Who lived in a shoe

    She had so many children

    She didn't know what to do

    How she ended up there

    I haven't a clue

    G:

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The Collapse of Building 7 by Arthur Scheuerman December 8, 06

    There has been a new, and I might add weird, developement since Pomaroo did his "Ronald Wieck's 911 skeptic show~starring Arthur Scheuerman". The document that I was refering to has somehow been cloned into a completely different version of the original.


    RE: March 1, 2008

    jref forums .... arthur

    http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?p=3483044

    I find
    _________

    Yesterday, 05:50 PM #212
    LashL
    Goddess of Legaltainment™

    LashL's Avatar

    Join Date: Aug 2006
    Location: Toronto
    Posts: 4,966
    Donor

    Originally Posted by pomeroo View Post
    Arthur e-mailed me a 13-page paper on WTC 7 (2.78 MB). I'd like to make it available to the regulars on this forum, but I don't know how to do it. Any suggestions?

    I created a site to host it, available here.


    ETA: I corrected two small typos while converting it to html, but it is otherwise unchanged from the Word document.


    The Collapse of Building 7

    By Arthur Scheuerman

    FDNY Battalion Chief, Retired

    Posted February 29, 2008

    ReplyDelete
  9. If you compare these two articles that are the same name with the same author, but with a now current date?,
    you will find that about 1/2 of the first paragraph was deleted, and that is the tip of the iceberg.

    RE:

    "Since it
    was a “fire resistive” building, there would have been every expectation that the
    fires would burn out without any local or global collapse. However, given that the
    towers had collapsed and that there had been a serious interior collapse of
    Building 5, there was concern, and the collapse area around the building was
    cleared. The building suffered global collapse from fire after several hours of
    uncontrolled burning. There were no known injuries or fatalities in the collapse."

    ReplyDelete
  10. from the video

    Pomaroo: "Now Arthur it sounds to me like this is an extraordinary feat by the fire department to avoid
    any more loss of life on this terrible day".

    Arthur says "Yeh, absolutely, especially when you abandon a building and there is an uncontrolled fire, there is a possibility of collapse no matter what kind of building it is uh if the fire is bad enough



    From the re-written artical by? Arthur Scheuerman

    The anticipation of collapse was a brilliant conclusion and no lives were lost when the 47 story building collapsed about an hour and a half after the evacuation order was given. The BBC somehow misheard the orders to evacuate the collapse zone and reported the building had collapsed well before it actually did.

    Hmmmm.......Now compare these to the deleted part of the first artical which is on the previoous comment above...G:

    ReplyDelete
  11. Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now keep it up!

    ReplyDelete
  12. http://www.show-the-house.com/id107.html

    proof of lies, as simple to understand as "what direction does the sun rise each morning?"

    ReplyDelete
  13. Thanks for the comments on this blog. I am still hopeful that a real investigation will happen.
    I am looking to the East...G:

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hello! I simply would like to give you a big thumbs up for the great info you have got
    right here on this post. I am coming back to your blog for more soon.
    Have a look at my homepage :: http://kowiki.mykowi.net/index.php?title=Get_For_Beauty_Products_And_Makeup_Kit_In_India

    ReplyDelete
  15. An intriguing discussion is definitely worth comment.
    I believe that you need to publish more on this subject matter, it might
    not be a taboo subject but generally people do not discuss such issues.
    To the next! Kind regards!!

    Feel free to surf to my page esponjadelufa.com

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thankfulness to my father who shared with me on the topic of
    this blog, this website is actually awesome.

    Stop by my web blog acoustic guitar a chord

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hi there, I read your blogs daily. Your writing style is awesome, keep doing what you're doing!

    Also visit my website; http://toptipstosavingmoney.com/finding-cool-kids-clothing-while-not-going-over-your-spending-budget/

    ReplyDelete