WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II)
Some viewers have questioned the details of the measurements shown in this video. I have created a FAQ page to deal with these questions. See WTC7 Measurement FAQ
In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at freefall, but the coverup was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged freefall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance. Part I chronicles NIST's attempted obfuscation and eventual admission of freefall. Part II demonstrates that their replacement theory is based on fabricated evidence and is a continuation of the coverup. Part III will spell out the significance of NIST's admission of freefall.
WTC7: Nist Finally Admits Freefall (Part III)
WTC7 in Freefall--No Longer Controversial
Here's David Chandlers excellent information web site 911speakout.org
Go to www.AE911truth.org and sign the petition for a REAL investigation.
And here is an old article from Dec. 12, 2008 with comments by David Chandler, Arthur Scheuerman, and Mark anybody (possibly Gravy?)...
NIST's analysis of freefall speed vs David Chandler