By PomerooHardfire News
17th January 2008
The BBC is planning a follow-up to the documentary on 9/11, concentrating on the collapse of WTC 7. The producer wants to use parts of a 'Hardfire' debate. I am planning to tape on February 26, and I assume that I will feature the redoubtable Mark Roberts and retired FDNY battalion chief Arthur Scheuerman for the rationalist sdie. As regulars here are aware, my search for fantasist opposition has proved fruitless. Jim Fetzer has volunteered for a rematch with Mark, and claims he can bring along an "expert" on WTC 7. Personally, I'm willing to go with Fetzer (maybe you'd prefer Les Jamieson--see what I mean?). Unlike every other prominent conspiracist, he doesn't get an attack of vapors whenever Mark's name is mentioned. Like soldiers for the Confederacy, he displays courage in the service of a bad cause.
To members of the fantasist community: If you don't feel comfortable with Jim Fetzer being presented as the face of your movement, then it's high time a new champion, someone with cajones, stepped up to the plate. No guts, no glory.
Hmm, most interesting that Pomeroo chooses Arthur Scheuerman for the rationalist side, yet calls Fetzer a conspiracy theorist. Arthur Scheuerman is listed as a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice as well as Dr. James Fetzer. I guess this speaks volumes for the 911 Truth Movement, who can be seen for exactly what they are. Unbiased seekers of the truth, but only indicates a lopsided discussion to me, unless maybe Pomeroo plans on bringing in a truth seeking ex General, and maybe an Architect or Engineer (hard to find?) who questions the NIST report.
I thought that there are architects and scientists who dispute the 9/11 N.I.S.T. report?
ReplyDeleteProbably afraid to come out because they know their jobs would be threatened if they spoke out.
This is one of those deals like Roswell where nothing will come out until everyone involved is either dead, or confessing on their death-beds!
Pomeroo appears to be a government shill and is interested only in debunking any organized investigation
ReplyDeleteexcept for the NIST report, which isn't even an investigation. There has never been an open and independent investigation on the WTC disaster.
Here's a website showing a whole bunch of architects and engineers speaking out...G:
There are quite a few ex military and ex CIA folks who are speaking out too. I wonder if this is one of the reasons that Bu$hco is stonewalling an independent investigation?
ReplyDeletehttp://patriotsquestion911.com/
For more on this subject please check out this link on Suzie-Q. ...G:
ReplyDeleteAw, this was a very nice post. Spending some time and actual
ReplyDeleteeffort to create a superb article… but what can I say… I hesitate a whole lot
and never seem to get nearly anything done.
Review my blog ... saleswoman seo
Have you ever considered creating an e-book or
ReplyDeleteguest authoring on other websites? I have a blog based on the same ideas
you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information.
I know my viewers would value your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to send me an
email.
Here is my weblog ... dubai-Nightclub.com