Friday, November 16, 2007

Giuliani - September Criminal or 911 hero?



Bill Manning, editor of Fire Engineering, a 125-year-old-monthly firefighting trade magazine with ties to the New York City Fire Department, wrote in an editor's opinion piece in the January 2002 issue called "$elling Out the Investigation", "Fire Engineering has good reason to believe that the 'official investigation' blessed by FEMA and run by the American Society of Civil Engineers is a half-baked farce that may already have been commandeered by political forces whose primary interests, to put it mildly, lie far afield of full disclosure." He also called for an immediate stop to the removal of steel from the site of ground zero saying the steel from the site should be preserved as a crime scene so that investigators can examine what caused the collapse and pass that knowledge on to future generations of engineers. The editorial continues, "A growing number of fire protection engineers have theorized that 'the structural damage from the planes and the explosive ignition of jet fuel in themselves were not enough to bring down the towers," the editorial stated.

And yet rather than preserve that scene or allow the emergency workers to search for their fallen comrades, Giuliani instead brought in the NYPD to seal off the area and minimize any search and rescue work. He was in a rush to start dismantling ?the pile' siding with developers and agreed to a plan to sell off the scrap metal to foreign nations for even cheaper than what they could have sold it for here in the States. Why go through the trouble of shipping scrap metal out of country if you do not have something to hide? "New York authorities' decision to ship the twin towers' scrap to recyclers has raised the anger of victims' families and some engineers who believe the massive girders should be further examined to help determine how the towers collapsed."

6 comments:

  1. Yeah, it's pretty obvious to anyone with a working brain or their hands not shoved into the cookie jar that "Mr. 911" is up to his nose in compliance with the elitists. You can't tell me that the speedy clean-up was for the morale of the country, or the grieving families! It was to hide the evidence... evidence of a guilty government's compliance with outside 'influences' of corporate greed, among other things.

    Check this out when you get some time, Geez.

    http://www.physics911.net/pearl

    I'd posted it on my old site, but I don't know if anyone read it other than maybe Dad. Tell me what you think!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yo Highwayman, good to here that your still on the innertube, the new blog has a totally zorch look to it...

    The Pearl scenario makes a lot more sense than the nist story, but presents a hypothetical case which is just an antithesis of Bu$hsco's obvious lies.

    Pearl could be wrong on the radar not showing the elevation. When I was on ship, I ran the PPI scope (plan position indicater}, and right neXt to it was the vertical radar which gave the vertical angle and distance to the blip, which then converted to elevation to be used in conjunction with the location and speed.

    What we need to fight those bastards is concrete evidence, while there is no concrete to be found because allmost all of it was reduced to a fine powder.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yeah, the author does say it's a theory, and like you say, it's definitely more feasible than the song and dance we're fed from Bu$hco.

    You know what that means, though, if the passengers were all gassed and dumped at sea? This is MAJOR shit, man! It would be hard for the public to grasp that their government would stoop so low, even in light of the numerous false flag operations throughout history.

    It would explain the appearance of those military-looking planes that hit the towers, too. Also, the accounts of those unknowns being processed at the airport mentioned.

    I'm no longer convinced the passengers were even on the planes that hit the WTC, unless you have some intel I haven't seen. Like the PEARL scenario says, they may have 'collected' samples from the passengers beforehand, to distribute and later be 'found' in the debris...

    I don't put anything past the elitists!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yep...imho the dna evidence was manufactured. Most of the poor souls that were in WTC1 & WTC2 were incinerated and the only ones that were not were probably in the lower levels. Human remains were found on the roof tops of surrounding buildings years later. Just bone fragments, but the largest being about 1/8" in size. The only thing left was mainly steel, with everything else turned to a fine powder. No wonder they closed the whole area off and limited the evidence that was submited to investigators. There is so much evidence in spite of their attempts
    to destroy it and hide it, that they can't allow this to be shown in a fair trial. Nothing worse than despairate evil doers.

    Keep in mind that anyone who quotes the constitution now qualifies as a conspiracy theorist.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yup boys, Big Brother is here with a vengeance, Newspeak is all the rage and he ain't takin' any prisoners!

    When I saw these events unfold on TV six years ago, my heart sank right to the basement because I knew instinctively that whatever little was left of the Republic, died right there in front of me.

    ReplyDelete
  6. We knew it was coming.

    It's about time for another 'booster shot' of totalitarianism, too.

    Can't let the fire get low...

    ReplyDelete